…As UK deeply disappointed by Honda’s decision to close plant***
A senior North Korean official says his country is facing
dwindling food supplies and has been forced to cut food rations for its people,
according to a memo obtained by NBC News.
The memo, written by Kim Song, the North Korean ambassador to the United Nations, appears to be an unusual admission that the country lacks enough food to feed its people, a situation that Kim blamed on a combination of natural disasters and the sanctions regime that is making it difficult to obtain farming equipment.
Song said the North Korean government was urgently
requesting help from international organizations to feed its people.
The memo was obtained by NBC News from the country’s United
Nations mission.
Kim’s claims are difficult to verify, and his government has
not always been a reliable source of internal statistics. He said a food
assessment, conducted late last year in conjunction with the UN’s World Food
Program, found that the country produced 503,000 fewer tons of food than in
2017 due to record high temperatures, drought, heavy rainfall and — in an
unexpected admission — sanctions.
The food agency could not immediately confirm that the
organization conducted an assessment with North Korea or the conclusions the
country shared in the memo.
In a plea for food assistance from international
organizations, however, the memo states that sanctions “restricting the
delivery of farming materials in need is another major reason” the country
faces shortages that has forced it to cut “food rations per capita for a family
of blue or white collar workers” from 550 grams to 300 grams in January.
“All in all, it vindicates that humanitarian assistance from
the UN agencies is terribly politicized and how barbaric and inhuman sanctions
are,” the memo says.
Though the country plans to increase food imports and
harvest its crops early this year, the memo says that North Korea would still
face food shortages and may only increase rations by 10 grams in July.
This unusual admission from a country that tends toward secrecy came just before President Donald Trump prepares to face North Korea leader Kim Jong Un next week in Vietnam. The White House hopes to pressure Kim to rid his country of nuclear weapons.
Experts warned, however, that the claims of a severe
shortage might be a negotiating tactic ahead of the two-day summit.
“It may be admitting weakness, but it’s not without a plan,”
said Dr. Victor Cha, who served as the director for Asian Affairs at the National
Security Council during the Bush administration.
Cha said that North Korea may feel that it has some momentum
to convince Trump to loosen the sanctions against it, especially with South
Korea, China and Russia “beating down the doors of the United States.”
But for the United States to blink in next week’s
confrontation, the Trump administration will have to see results, Cha said.
“They’re going to want some denuclearization steps from
North Korea, but I don’t think the North Koreans are going to give up very
much,” Cha said. “When we talk about any sanction-lifting though, a lot of
experts would say the place where you can do the least harm and the most good
for the North Korean people is through humanitarian sanctions.”
Of North Korea’s 25 million people, 10.3 million or 41 percent of the population face food insecurity and 10.1 million suffer from malnutrition, according to a March 2018 UN report.
In an attempt to increase the pressure against Kim’s regime and their nuclear program, the Trump administration increased sanctions that essentially cut off the flow of international humanitarian aid to North Korea, according to an August Reuters report. U.S. humanitarian aid in 2018 dropped nearly 57 percent from the year prior, the wire service reported.
Though it is clear that North Korea is receiving less aid,
it is more than unusual for them to publicly admit that sanctions are working
and causing the nation to suffer.
The White House National Security Council and the State
Department did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
North Korea has previously acknowledged food shortages,
appealed for humanitarian aid and blamed international sanctions for creating problems
for its agricultural production, experts and former U.S. officials said.
The country has repeatedly suffered food crises in recent decades, due to a combination of inefficient collectivist farming methods and bad weather. A devastating famine in the mid-1990s claimed the lives of up to three million people, and some aid experts called it one of the 20th century’s worst famines.
Last year, the Trump administration stopped granting visas
to humanitarian workers who had been traveling to North Korea to provide aid to
farmers and medical assistance in a country where malaria and tuberculosis are
endemic. Aid groups wrote a letter to the administration in October arguing
that the block on visas violated international law, would exacerbate the
country’s dire humanitarian situation and that would only undermine any
diplomatic initiative by Washington.
The administration told aid groups in January it would ease
the restrictions to allow them to resume their work in the North.
Daniel Jasper, advocacy coordinator for the American Friends
Service Committee, a Quaker charity that has conducted humanitarian work in
North Korea for decades, said the sanctions and the way they have been enforced
has “inhibited our operations.”
“It’s reasonable to infer there would be food insecurity” as
a result of the sanctions, Jasper said.
Even if North Korea managed its resources more efficiently,
it does not have enough arable land to feed its population of about 24 million
people, Jasper said. Much of the Korean peninsula’s fertile land lies in South
Korea.
“The division has always taken a toll on food security in
the North,” he said.
The North Korean regime in the past also has linked
negotiations over its nuclear program to food aid, demanding more assistance as
a condition for taking part in talks.
The new memo is consistent with Pyongyang’s tactics “to
weaken the sanctions regime by appealing to humanitarian concerns,” said Jung
Pak, a former CIA officer and now senior fellow at the Brookings Institution.
“Even though the regime imports hundreds of millions of
dollars in luxury items, it consistently blames the U.S. and U.N. for its
problems,” she said.
Sue Mi Terry, who tracked North Korea as a CIA analyst, said
she believes the regime is preparing the way for the upcoming summit.
“What they want is sanctions relief. That’s the main thing
that they’re looking for,” said Terry, now a senior fellow at the Center for
Strategic and International Studies. “They are laying the groundwork for this
meeting with Trump. This makes sense.”
The Trump administration will probably be open to broadening
exemptions for humanitarian aid, as it would be something concrete to offer to
Pyongyang without having to fully lift the economic sanctions before North
Korea makes substantial concessions over its nuclear weapons program, she said.
This could be “one of the deliverables at this second
summit,” Terry said.
In the meantime, Britain on Tuesday said it was deeply disappointed
by Honda’s decision to close its only British car plant.
“The UK is one of the leaders in the development of these technologies and so
it is deeply disappointing that this decision has been taken now,” Business
Secretary, Greg Clark, said. “This is a devastating decision for Swindon and
the UK.
This is a commercial decision based on unprecedented changes
in the global market,’’ Clark said. Honda said it had informed employees about
what it called its “proposal’’to close the Swindon plant. “Honda of the UK
Manufacturing has today informed associates (employees) of the proposal to
close its Swindon vehicle manufacturing plant, at the end of the current
model’s production life cycle, in 2021,” Honda said in a statement.
Similarly, Honda’s decision to close its only British car
plant is not related to Brexit and is a product of global changes in the
industry, the firm’s Europe’s boss said on Tuesday.
“This is not a
Brexit-related issue for us. This decision has been made on the basis of global
changes,” Honda Senior Vice President for Europe, Ian Howells, said. He said
that China, the U.S. and Japan were where the firm would focus its investments.
“Although… we were very clear on our Brexit position, we’ve
always seen those as something we will get through,” he said. On Monday,
Japanese car-maker Honda announced the closure of its only British car plant in
2022, with the loss of 3,500 jobs, a lawmaker said, in the latest blow to
the UK car industry as Brexit approaches. Honda built just over 160,000
vehicles at its Swindon factory in southern England in 2018, where it makes the
Civic and CV-R models.
This accounted for a little more than 10 per cent of
Britain’s total output of 1.52 million cars. But it has struggled in Europe in
recent years, and the industry faces a number of challenges, including
declining diesel demand and tougher regulations, alongside the uncertainty over
Britain’s departure from the EU, due in March.
Justin Tomlinson, a Conservative lawmaker for Swindon, who
voted for Brexit in 2016, said he had met with the business minister and
representatives from Honda, who had confirmed the plans. “This is not
Brexit-related. It is a reflection of the global market. They are seeking to
consolidate production in Japan.”
Japan has repeatedly warned it could pull investments in Britain,
which it had seen as a gateway into Europe, if London does not secure a Brexit
deal favourable for trade. The recently agreed EU-Japan trade agreement means
tariffs on cars from Japan to the continent will be eliminated, while Britain
is struggling to make progress on talks over post-Brexit trade relations with
Tokyo.
Honda’s announcement would come just over two weeks after
rival Japanese car-maker Nissan canceled plans to build its X-Trail sport
utility vehicle in Britain.
“The car industry in the UK over the last two decades has
been the jewel in the crown for the manufacturing sector – and now it has been
brought low by the chaotic Brexit uncertainty,” said Des Quinn, National
Officer for the Automotive Sector at Britain’s biggest Trade Union Unite.
Honda said in 2018 it
would shut its British operations for six days in April to help counter any
border disruption from Brexit. It was also preparing to front-load some
production at its plant to ship overseas or build up inventories. Nissan, Honda
and a third Japanese car-maker, Toyota, together account for roughly half of
the cars built in Britain.
Honda, which has been building more cars for sale outside of
Europe in recent years, said earlier this month its production volumes at
Swindon would be reduced to 570 cars per day and that it would make job cuts.
“This reduction in volume will not have any impact on our permanent resource levels, and is in line with our current production plans,” the company said.
Additional report from NBC