Connect with us

World News

First-of-its-kind missile-defense drill sees multiple systems fire at same targets

Published

on

First-of-its-kind missile-defense drill sees multiple systems fire at same targets

A first-of-its-kind missile defense test held by the Israeli Defense Ministry, together with Rafael Advanced Systems and the Pentagon’s Missile Defense Agency, has seen interceptor missiles from two different types of air-defense systems fired at the same targets.

The purpose of the live-fire trials was to test the ability of multiple tiers in Israel’s air-defense system to share the same sky picture and deal with the same threats, giving air defenders multiple opportunities to strike incoming enemy missiles.

During the tests, held over the Mediterranean Sea off the Israeli coastline in recent days, interceptors from two Rafael-made systems—David’s Sling and Iron Dome—were fired at targets simulating a range of advanced threats, such as maneuvering ballistic missiles and cruise missiles. The Iranian axis threatens Israel with such offensive capabilities from several fronts.

The Israel Air Force and Navy participated in the drill as well. A combination of naval and civilian vessels fired the simulated threats to test the ability of Israel’s multi-tier defense system to detect, track and kill the threats in time.

“This successful series is a critical milestone in the augmentation of Israel’s operational capabilities in defending itself against current and future threats,” the Defense Ministry said in a statement.

“The series tested the capabilities of a new and advanced version of the David’s Sling weapon system and included a number of scenarios simulating future threats. The results of this test will enable the Israel Missile Defense Organization [a part of the Defense Ministry] and industry engineers to evaluate and upgrade the system’s capabilities.”

‘This is the concept of inter-operability’

Senior Israeli defense officials who spoke to journalists on Tuesday explained that combining air-defense systems in a live-fire trial marked a key precedent and that the trial’s success has made Israel safer.

The head of the Israel Missile Defense Organization, Moshe Patel and the and the head of Rafael’s Air and Missile Defense Division,  Brig. Gen. (Res.) Pini Yungman, explained that the David’s Sling system has a much longer interception range than Iron Dome and operates at higher altitudes. “David’s Sling is a zone defense,” said Yungman. “Iron Dome has a shorter range and intercepts at a lower altitude. This means that once you are launching against the same target, David’s Sling is trying to intercept it at longer ranges in the same defended area. If you miss, you have redundancy to intercept with Iron Dome. This is the idea of a multi-year system.”

Also read:  Is the window closing for Israel to apply sovereignty over Judea and Samaria?

Patel said that the third component of the system—Israel Aerospace Industries-made Arrow interceptors—simulated their own high-altitude responses to the threats, taking a computerized part in the trials.

David’s Sling Stunner interception missiles were first fired at threats, and Iron Dome Tamir interceptors were fired a few seconds later, said Yungman. “This is the concept of inter-operability. I think it’s the first time ever that we implemented not only inter-operability in tracking the threats and sharing the data, the air picture, but also the first time ever that we launched against the same threats with different systems in one, integrated command and control system,”

Sa’ar 5-type navy corvettes fired Iron Dome interceptors, while David’s Sling was fired from a civilian ship at sea.

When both systems operate against the same threat, the interception range approaches 100 percent, said Yungman. “We are very near to that in a multi-tier system. Israel is safer than before.”

Patel said that each system has its own array of radars and sensors, all connected into a single air-defense architecture, with each radar informing the other air defense systems of aerial activities.

“We don’t care where the detection started,” said Yungman. “Rafael’s method of developing Iron Dome and David’s Sling is an open architecture method. It doesn’t matter which sensor detected and tracked the threat. The air picture is common. This is the main idea of interoperability.”

The trials also tested the ability to shoot down hostile unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs).

‘All of the targets were destroyed’

U.S. Vice Admiral Jon Hill,  director of the Missile Defense Agency, watched the trials live by video conference and later told Defense Minister Benny Gantz that he could “not be happier for the State of Israel” following the trial’s success.

“We have full coordination with the Missile Defense Agency,” said Patel. “Even though there is a pandemic, we have secure lines, and the director of the MDA, Admiral Hill, was watching the flight test.”

Other defense companies from Israel and the United States, including IAI-Elta and Raytheon, also took part.

“The results were magnificent,” said Patel. “All of the targets were destroyed in all the tests—no target stayed in the air after the interception. Our missiles destroyed all of them.”

 

 

 

JNS 

 

Continue Reading
Advertisement Simply Easy Learning
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Latest News

Alleged Boko Haram Funding: Senate Invites NSA, NIA, 2 Other Security Agencies

Published

on

Alleged Boko Haram Funding: Senate Invites NSA, NIA, 2 Other Security Agencies

The Senate has summoned the National Security Adviser, Malam Nuhu Ribadu, to provide a briefing on the alleged funding of Boko Haram by the United States Agency for International Development (USAID).

Also invited are the heads of the National Intelligence Agency (NIA), Defence Intelligence Agency (DIA) and the Department of State Security Services (DSS).

According to the upper legislative chamber, the meeting with the heads of these security agencies will be in close session.

The senate’s resolution follows a motion sponsored by Sen. Ali Ndume (APC-Borno) during the plenary session on Wednesday in Abuja.

The motion was prompted by a trending social media video in which U.S. Congressman Scott Perry claimed that the U.S. aid agency, the United States Agency for International Development (USAID), had funded terrorist organisations, including Boko Haram.

Perry, a Republican representative from Pennsylvania, made this claim during the inaugural hearing of the Sub-committee on Delivering on Government Efficiency.

The session, titled “The War on Waste: Stamping out the Scourge of Improper Payments and Fraud,” focused on alleged misappropriations of taxpayer funds.

Ndume said the social media had been awash with the trending video of a United States Republican congressman, Scott Perry representing Pennsylvania alleged that USAID had been funding terrorist organisations across the world, Boko Haram inclusive.

He said that the devastation caused by Boko Haram in the North-East region of Nigeria and other parts of the country, included bombing, the UN office in Abuja and police headquarters among other attacks.

He stated that the attacks had become a major concern, causing the loss of thousands of Nigerian lives and widespread destruction of property, leading to an unprecedented level of internal displacement across the country.

Ndume noted that over the years, the Federal Government had made significant efforts to implement measures aimed at curbing the activities of terrorist groups, spending substantial resources.

However, these efforts appeared to have yielded limited results, as terrorist activities persisted.

He said that the monumental devastation caused by Boko Haram in Nigeria should be a matter of concern as it had dented the image of the country among the community of nations.

Ndume said allegations began to emerge at this point that some international organisations were behind the unwholesome acts.

He therefore added that urgent steps needed to be taken by the federal government to unravel the mystery.

Contributing Sen.Shehu Kaka (APC-Borno), who seconded the motion said the allegation was weighty, saying that banditry and other forms of criminality had affected the 109 senatorial districts.

He emphasised that efforts should be focused on uncovering the sources of funding for Boko Haram.

Sen. Abdul Ningi (PDP-Bauchi) said that it would be impossible for the senate to adequately address the matter in plenary without the input of relevant security agencies, who should be invited to brief the senate on the issue.

Ningi, therefore, urged the senate to adopt a single motion to invite the NSA, as well as the heads of the DSS, NIA, and DIA, to brief the senate on the allegation.

In his remarks, Senate President, Godswill Akpabio thanked Ningi for his contribution and emphasised that the concerned security agencies should brief the senate in a closed session.

He noted that such sensitive security matters should not be discussed in public.

Continue Reading

Latest News

Trump Administration Mandates There are Only Two Biological Sexes

Published

on

Macron, Scholz, Other World Leaders Congratulate Trump

…Revokes ‘nearly 80 destructive radical executive actions’ of Biden administration

On Monday, U.S. President Donald Trump signed an order proclaiming that there are only two biological sexes: male and female.

Trump signed the order from the White House just hours after his inauguration.

“My Administration will defend women’s rights and protect freedom of conscience by using clear and accurate language and policies that recognise women are biologically female, and men are biologically male,” the order states.

“It is the policy of the United States to recognise two sexes – male and female.

“These sexes are not changeable and are grounded in fundamental and incontrovertible reality.”

The order directs that official government documents, such as passports and visas, reflect male and female as the only two sexes.

“The erasure of sex in language and policy has a corrosive impact not just on women but on the validity of the entire American system,” the order states, referring to “gender ideology extremism.”

U.S. presidents can implement political priorities with the help of so-called executive orders without the approval of the U.S. Congress.

However, they can also be challenged in court more easily than laws.

Trump had announced during his election campaign that he would take political measures against the rights of transgender people in the United States.

He spoke of “transgender lunacy” and “child sexual mutilation,” and repeatedly made disparaging comments about those affected.

The participation of trans women in sports events was particularly made an election campaign topic by the Republicans.

Trans people or transgender individuals are those who do not feel they belong to the gender they were born as.

Trump’s statements are part of a broader societal debate in the U.S., where conservative circles are increasingly demanding measures against the rights of lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender (LGBT+) individuals.

Tech billionaire Elon Musk, one of Trump’s closest confidants, has also expressed criticism of medical treatments for trans young people.

His child, Vivian Jenna Wilson, who has lived openly as a trans woman since 2020, has publicly criticised him for his stance. 

In another development, U.S. President Donald Trump on Monday took gigantic steps to revoke immediate past U.S. President Joe Biden’s policies by signing executive orders.

Trump signed a few other executive orders in front of the crowd at Capital One Arena in Washington, D.C., just a few hours after being sworn in as the 47th president of the United States, including the revocation of nearly 80 executive orders from the Biden administration.

“I’m revoking nearly 80 destructive radical executive actions of the previous administration,” Trump told the crowd at the signing ceremony.

Trump signed an executive order to delay the TikTok ban imposed by the Biden administration by 75 days “to permit my Administration an opportunity to determine the appropriate course of action concerning TikTok.”

He also signed an executive order that will let the United States withdraw from the World Health Organisation.

Trump also declared a national energy emergency in an executive order with an eye on driving down energy costs.

As the first of this kind declared by the U.S. Federal Government, the emergency is expected to enable the government to crank up energy production by tapping emergency powers.

The United States is the largest producer of both crude oil and natural gas and is also the top exporter of liquified natural gas (LNG) globally.

The incoming U.S. president also signed an executive order to pull the United States out of the Paris climate accord.

The move means the United States will pull out of the Paris climate accord for the second time.

During his inauguration speech, Trump, who has long regarded clean energy as expensive and wasteful, also vowed to redouble the efforts to extract and utilise fossil fuels.

“I will also declare a national energy emergency. We will drill, baby, drill,” he said.

“We have something that no other manufacturing nation will ever have — the largest amount of oil and gas of any country on Earth,” Trump claimed. “And we are going to use it.”

Adopted in December 2015, the Paris Agreement is an international endeavour to tackle human-caused global warming and related crises, which the United States formally joined in September 2016.

The first Trump administration officially let the United States, one of the world’s top emitters of greenhouse gases, exit the Paris climate accord in November 2020, dealing a major blow to international efforts to combat the climate crisis.

The latest executive order among many others by Trump will mark another round of back-and-forth moves regarding the U.S. commitment to dealing with climate change on the global stage.

Joe Biden, who succeeded Trump in becoming the 46th U.S. president in 2021, signed an executive order on Jan. 20, 2021 — his first day in office — to bring the United States back into the Paris climate accord.  

– dpa, with additional information from Xinhua

Continue Reading

Latest News

WTO Hosts Seminar On Green Supply Chains

Published

on

WTO Hosts Seminar On Green Supply Chains

A seminar on “Building greener and more Resilient Supply Chains” was held in Geneva as part of the World Trade Organisation (WTO) Public Forum 2024.

It was co-hosted by the China Council for the Promotion of International Trade (CCPIT) and the International Trade Centre (ITC).

The four-day public forum would feature over 130 sessions with nearly 4,400 participants from government, business, academia, and civil society.

CCPIT Chairman Ren Hongbin said that today’s globalised economy created both opportunities and challenges.

He emphasised the need to embrace openness and inclusiveness while upholding true multilateralism.

He also stressed that building greener and more resilient supply chains was crucial to addressing global challenges.

ITC Deputy Executive Director Dorothy Tembo underscored the ITC’s commitment to collaborating with partners to offer technical assistance to small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs).

It would offer assistance, especially to those in developing countries, to tap into the potential of cross-border e-commerce.

She said the goal was to build greener supply chains and reduce the carbon footprint of e-commerce, thereby contributing more to sustainable development.

In its Digital Economy Report 2024, the United Nations Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD) emphasised the urgent need to adopt an environmentally sustainable and inclusive digital strategy, said UNCTAD’s head of E-Commerce and Digital Economy.

Torbjorn Frederick stressed that China had issued innovative guidelines promoting the sustainable development of the digital economy. 

– Xinhua

Continue Reading

Editor’s Pick

Politics